Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

116 results found

  1. Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd comes up as the wrong case

    I was looking for NORTH EASTERN DAIRY CO. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W. ; CARROLL'S FOOD MART PTY. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W.

    (1975) 134 CLR 559

    17 October 1975 and found the search result was Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. NT Legislation update

    Good morning,

    I haven't been able to get through to an editor, could you please update 'Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT)' there have been amendments since early 2024.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. correct the entry for [2017] actsc 5 which should be Estate of Love not Farrell

    see above

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Bug - unable to generate PDF of cases

    Your download case in PDF function seems to still be down. Any idea when this will be resolved? Thank you

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Printing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Please fix the bug so I can download the cases.

    I am unable to download cases at the moment. Please give an idea on when this will be fixed.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. Correct the judgment

    Hi folks,
    LH v R [2024] NSWCCA 165 seems to be listed as the Commonwealth DPP appearing, whereas in fact it was the NSW ODPP. See NSW Caselaw.
    Thanks!
    KG

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. it looks like the health practitioner regulation national law is broken...

    On this page: https://jade.io/article/353065
    The schedule is missing and the citations that refer to that schedule are instead being treated as if they cite sections of the parent act.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. Availability of Corporations Act volumes 2-7

    Only volume 1 of the Corporations Act is available - there does not seem to be any way to view volumes 2-7, other than through the small preview windows available for individual sections.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. open https://jade.io/article/317167 - "fragrantly" s/be "flagrantly".

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. AICmr Decisions

    it would be great if you could include decisions of the Australian Information Commissioner within the FOI and Privacy topic in the Cth Tribunals collection. The decisions are published to Austlii at http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/cases/cth/AICmr/

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. Expensive points

    This is a comment pertaining to financial trustworthiness. I just had white gold and perfect 3 sapphire ring stolen when it was on my neck as I slept by someone who wants to prove I am indeed inept and need financial management.
    I am afraid to go to Berry St as thr system has been a giant test and the diamond necklace from zgrandpa was 6qnkednoff my neck but I fought for it.
    How is this fair when people get paid to make me look even worse?

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Mobile JADE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. Have a simple process for cancelling subscriptions. I've tried looking on the website, asking live chat, emailing and phoning.

    It would be great if accounts could be managed online - maybe I've missed the relevant part of the website, but live chat didn't know either and told me to email. My email was acknowledged by someone who was sad that I'd asked to cancel and offered training so I could get more out of my subscription, and neither of my calls to support have been returned

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Responsiveness  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. fix a missing link - the link to original document for the case Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamo(2023) VCAT 634 is missing

    Please fix missing link to original document for - Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamond Creek Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] VCAT 634

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. hi guys. Check this case: Express Cargo Services Pty Ltd v Mysko [2023] SASC 11. The hyperlinks are such a GREAT idea, but they don't work.

    Hi guys, I was so impressed with the hyperlink approach in this case. Surely it has to be the way of future court reports instead of these ridiculous tomes that are the current format. With hyperlinks the reader can immediately go to salient points. With so many cases impacting not only on students but also practitioners, this is the way of the immediate future (before more AI impacts of course). PROBLEM: the hyperlinks don't appear to take me to the proper target in this case. Can you check it and see what you get please. I'm dying to use the…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. You've got R v Barger [1908] HCA 43 as "1932] AC 41" which is Donoghue v Stevenson

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. File download name

    When you download a case from Jade make the file name the case name and citation

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. Fix this reference

    I have been trying to find citations to Katsilis v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1977) 18 ALR 181; (1977) 52 ALJR 189 but when I search for it in Jade I keep being directed to Allen v Tobias [1958] HCA 13; 98 CLR 367, which is not the same case.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. I NO LONGER WANT TO RECEIVE YOUR EMAILS

    As above!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. Problem linking to caselawNSW

    Hello, links to 'original source' for NSW cases are throwing up an
    HTTP Status 400 - Bad request
    and have been doing so for the past few weeks. There's no problem with other jurisdictions, just with NSW cases. Could you please let me know if this is a problem just for me or a problem with Jade?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)