BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
128 results found
-
Bug in a case
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case) (2017) 274 IR 460 takes you to the wrong case.
https://jade.io/article/567337?asv=citation_browser shows you a case of Kenny J: FKP18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1555 but this is actually a 2018 case.
[2017] FCA 1555 is
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case), a Tracey J decision.1 vote -
Fix a problem with Vice-Chancellor Macquarie University v FM
Most of the links to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) should be to Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)
1 vote -
It would be wonderful if you could please create a proper hyper-linked index for the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of C&C Act)
It's quite difficult to navigate the Australian Consumer Law on Jade at the moment (unless I'm missing something obvious) and also, it is not possible to use the citator to refer to specific sections within that Schedule 2 section (all of the references just plug to the header on page one of the Australian Consumer Law). Thanks!
4 votes -
7 votes
-
Add metadata to your pages to allow e.g. Zotero to recognise souce
Jade suffers a defect that e.g. Austlii does not suffer from, which is that your pages currently do not contain metatags of their content that allows programs like e.g. Zotero to recognise sources properly.
This makes Jade quite clumsy and inefficient for legal researchers who use citation programs like Zotero or Endnote to compile and use sources.
It's very simple to implement, this page would offer your web developers some starting points: https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/exposing_metadata
4 votes -
1 vote
-
Fix bug as below
"SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship" goes to "Sandy on behalf of the Yugara People v State of Queensland (No 2)" in some cases.
1 vote -
Website does not always load correctly
Occasionally when accessing jade via Chrome, only the search bar will load and not the rest of the page. You are also not able to search and need to reload page (sometimes a number of times) for it to load the web page correctly. Have been able to replicate this on several PCs. Is this something that has been reported or can be looked into?
3 votes -
12 votes
-
Tool so that users can see if they have viewed Jade content
My suggestion is that you establish a way in which users can tell whether they have read a case (for instance, by changing the colour of the heading). This tool is currently operative on Caselaw.
4 votes -
allow manual addition of cases to Topics
I have been doing a number of High Risk Offender matters in the Supreme Court in recent weeks. I've just noticed that the Jade Topic for this area doesn't seem to include key decisions (for example Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57; Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374). I would be happy to manually add a few of these decisions to the topic, but don't know if this is possible.
1 vote -
Include the Full Court judgment referred to below in your database.
Endeavour Energy v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FCAFC 82; (2016) 244 FCR 178 is mentioned in your citations, but appears not to be in your database.
1 vote -
add the attached case to your database. I acted for the successful defendant! :-)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCC/2008/1621.html
from Michael Martin
1 vote -
Create a new alert category for class actions / representative proceedings
I'd like to set up alerts for class actions/representative proceedings.
7 votes -
1 vote
-
User-highlighting
Allow for user-highlighting of cases within the Jade interface, so that the cases can be exported and/or printed already highlighted.
5 votes -
Bug
The Gulf Pacific link goes to the incorrect decision. See below.
Caple v Wilson [2016] VSC 704
210.The decision of Wilcox J in Krizaic indicates that a company can be liable even where it is not a party to the joint venture agreement, but its director is a party.
211.The obverse principle can be seen in Gulf Pacific Pty Ltd v Londish,[91] where it was held that the director can be liable in equity where the joint venture agreement only binds his or her company.
[91] [1992] FCA 502 (‘Gulf Pacific’).
1 vote -
Chrome Android - unable to tag highlighted segments unless using mouse
I regularly read cases on my Android phone. Selecting text does not bring up the tagging dialog, presumably because it requires a mouse hover action. Are you able to trigger the tagging dialog from normal text selection in chrome for Android? Cheers, Michael
4 votes -
12 votes
-
Fix R v Ellis references in DPP v McInnes
DPP v Mcinnes [2017] VSCA 374
Every citation of R v Ellis redirects to R v Brazel, where it should (of course) refer to R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603. Please fix. Thanks in anticipation.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?