Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

128 results found

  1. Everytime I try to search and review citations of the Trade Practices Act 1974 it automatically takes me to the Australian Consumer Law.

    I want to see the old Act!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Remove dual-factor login

    The new requirement to not only login, but also to obtain a code through your email, is slow and buggy.

    I keep being told I have received a verification code, but have not. I have checked my spam folder. I have clicked 'resend'. This happens repeatedly.

    What used to be a quick and enjoyable user experience has become a slow and painful one.

    Here's hoping Jade removes this unnecessary dual-factor login by default.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. [2006] WASAT 91 RV and PL brings up [2008] WASAT 91Shire of York

    [2006] WASAT 91 RV and PL brings up [2008] WASAT 91Shire of York - could you amend it please?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. email

    Stop requiring an email address in order to access the site.

    Jade has been my preferred legal resource for years. For a while I had a Jade pro account, but I let that lapse. For the first time today, I had to provide an email address to access the site at all. It was slow and buggy. I was working on my work computer, I entered my gmail address, the email came to my phone. Once I clicked the link on my pone, nothing happened on the work computer, so I tried the verification code (invalid). So then i waited…

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. fix typo on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro

    Typo/formatting issue on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro.

    Appears to be a formatting issue with the text under the heading "Upgrade to JADE Professional", after the full stop.

    "Purpose-built by Australian Lawyers, JADE Professional’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way.’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way."

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. make it easier to copy and paste sections from legislation

    This may be difficult given legislation is imported - but it would be great if it was easier to copy and paste sections of legislation with proper formatting into word or oneNote or into outlook. At the moment, regardless of using the jade copy function, or the browser copy button, sections are always incorrectly and inconsistently formatted and usually have the function put in erroneous numbered lists.

    I hate to suggest it, but is this something an AI tool could be used for? Assuming it wouldn't hallucinate and create its own sections and subsections...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. In the past, when I got the result of what I searched for, i could see the whole result. Now, i can only access 50. I detest this change.

    In the past, when I got the result of what I searched for, i could see the whole result. Now, i can only access 50. I detest this change

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. It would be wonderful if you had a Word plug-in which automatically suggests the full case citation (

    It would be wonderful if you had a Word plug-in which automatically suggests an auto-complete for the full case citation (a bit like the search bar on the Jade website).

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. link 2018 WASAT 94 to its appeal - [2019] WASC 270

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. delete all info regarding Jack Denis MULDER v. Director of Prosecution 3 sept 2015

    all info is false and now well outdated
    why is it still mentioned on internet?

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see [2025] HCASJ 17

    HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see 'Date of Hearing: 19 March 2025 Date of Judgment: 13 May 2025 [2025] HCASJ 17'

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. Please unsubscribe me from your emails. I have tried clicking unsubscribe but I am still getting emails.

    Please unsubscribe me from your emails. I have tried clicking unsubscribe but I am still getting emails.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd comes up as the wrong case

    I was looking for NORTH EASTERN DAIRY CO. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W. ; CARROLL'S FOOD MART PTY. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W.

    (1975) 134 CLR 559

    17 October 1975 and found the search result was Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. NT Legislation update

    Good morning,

    I haven't been able to get through to an editor, could you please update 'Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT)' there have been amendments since early 2024.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. correct the entry for [2017] actsc 5 which should be Estate of Love not Farrell

    see above

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. Please fix the bug so I can download the cases.

    I am unable to download cases at the moment. Please give an idea on when this will be fixed.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. Bug - unable to generate PDF of cases

    Your download case in PDF function seems to still be down. Any idea when this will be resolved? Thank you

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Printing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. Correct the judgment

    Hi folks,
    LH v R [2024] NSWCCA 165 seems to be listed as the Commonwealth DPP appearing, whereas in fact it was the NSW ODPP. See NSW Caselaw.
    Thanks!
    KG

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. it looks like the health practitioner regulation national law is broken...

    On this page: https://jade.io/article/353065
    The schedule is missing and the citations that refer to that schedule are instead being treated as if they cite sections of the parent act.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)