BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
47 results found
-
Put the name of the case/item in the tab name for easy tab switching
Keep the Jade logo in the Tab but have the case name as the text so it's easier to switch between tabs/windows and keep a bunch of cases up at once
23 votesGreat suggestion. Thanks! We’re on to it.
-
Include an indication on whether the authority has been applied, distinguished or rejected by a court of higher standing
Include an indication on whether the authority has been applied, distinguished or rejected by a court of higher standing
18 votesGreat suggestion. Thanks!
-
12 votes
We have this in the pipeline.
-
AICmr Decisions
it would be great if you could include decisions of the Australian Information Commissioner within the FOI and Privacy topic in the Cth Tribunals collection. The decisions are published to Austlii at http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/cases/cth/AICmr/
10 votes -
Consider better integration of user-generated content.
I assume that the team at Jade is familiar with CaseText (https://casetext.com/), a free US legal research site. CaseText's integration of user-generated content is quite seamless and user-friendly--perhaps in ways that Jade is not. Might be worth considering.
7 votesHi Alexander, we do integrate user-generated content. We are working to improve the integration in our next UI improvement round happening early in Q3, 2015.
-
It would be wonderful if you could please create a proper hyper-linked index for the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of C&C Act)
It's quite difficult to navigate the Australian Consumer Law on Jade at the moment (unless I'm missing something obvious) and also, it is not possible to use the citator to refer to specific sections within that Schedule 2 section (all of the references just plug to the header on page one of the Australian Consumer Law). Thanks!
7 votes -
Index SAET decisions
It would be very helpful to integrate decisions of the South Australian Employment Tribunal, particularly given the per-section citation functions of Jade. They are currently published here: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/cases/sa/SAET/
4 votes -
Get older state court decisions on Jade.
I am working with Permanent Building Society v Wheeler (1994) 11 WAR 187. It doesn't appear to be on Jade since too old. Would be great to get all decisions of state courts onto Jade. Thank you!
4 votes -
Add metadata to your pages to allow e.g. Zotero to recognise souce
Jade suffers a defect that e.g. Austlii does not suffer from, which is that your pages currently do not contain metatags of their content that allows programs like e.g. Zotero to recognise sources properly.
This makes Jade quite clumsy and inefficient for legal researchers who use citation programs like Zotero or Endnote to compile and use sources.
It's very simple to implement, this page would offer your web developers some starting points: https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/exposing_metadata
4 votes -
3 votes
-
File download name
When you download a case from Jade make the file name the case name and citation
3 votes -
Ensure that footnote hyperlinks work properly
The problem appears to be widespread, at least on Chrome browser.
One example: https://jade.io/article/299492 footnote 2
3 votes -
make it easier to copy and paste sections from legislation
This may be difficult given legislation is imported - but it would be great if it was easier to copy and paste sections of legislation with proper formatting into word or oneNote or into outlook. At the moment, regardless of using the jade copy function, or the browser copy button, sections are always incorrectly and inconsistently formatted and usually have the function put in erroneous numbered lists.
I hate to suggest it, but is this something an AI tool could be used for? Assuming it wouldn't hallucinate and create its own sections and subsections...
3 votes -
fix typo on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro
Typo/formatting issue on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro.
Appears to be a formatting issue with the text under the heading "Upgrade to JADE Professional", after the full stop.
"Purpose-built by Australian Lawyers, JADE Professional’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way.’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way."
1 vote -
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
1 vote -
Bug - this case not loading. Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923
Not loading.
Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923 (13 July 2017) (Parker J)
July 13th at 12:12 PM via Jade Equity
Catchwords: Contracts – retainer between solicitor and client – guarantee – construction – multiple contractual documents – main object of contract – deferral of costs – termination of retainer – acceleration of deferred costs – charges of property – consent to lodgement of caveat – issue of tax invoices – interest – repugnancy ...
1 vote -
Missing decision in Purvis precedent visualisation
I was checking out the precedent visualisation for Purvis v The State of NSW [2003] HCA 62, and noticed the most recent decision from the Qld Court of Appeal in Woodforth v State of Queensland [2017] QCA 100 does not appear therein (https://jade.io/article/531142).
The Woodforth decision is important in that it is the first court of appeal that rejects the application of the Purvis decision when applied to a discrimination provision that differs from that in the DDA. This case will have ripple effects in other Australian discrimination jurisdictions.
It would be good if the visualisation tool includes it.
1 vote -
fix mistake in relation to commencement date
Hi,
I have been looking at the Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic) and I believe some of the commencement information of certain sections may be incorrect.For example it says that s184 commenced on the 1st of January 2012, however I believe it commenced on the 1st of July, 2012.
Hope this is helpful. Thanks!
1 vote -
1 vote
-
allow manual addition of cases to Topics
I have been doing a number of High Risk Offender matters in the Supreme Court in recent weeks. I've just noticed that the Jade Topic for this area doesn't seem to include key decisions (for example Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57; Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374). I would be happy to manually add a few of these decisions to the topic, but don't know if this is possible.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?