BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
118 results found
-
Tool so that users can see if they have viewed Jade content
My suggestion is that you establish a way in which users can tell whether they have read a case (for instance, by changing the colour of the heading). This tool is currently operative on Caselaw.
4 votes -
Include the Full Court judgment referred to below in your database.
Endeavour Energy v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FCAFC 82; (2016) 244 FCR 178 is mentioned in your citations, but appears not to be in your database.
1 vote -
6 votes
-
add the attached case to your database. I acted for the successful defendant! :-)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCC/2008/1621.html
from Michael Martin
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Bug
The Gulf Pacific link goes to the incorrect decision. See below.
Caple v Wilson [2016] VSC 704
210.The decision of Wilcox J in Krizaic indicates that a company can be liable even where it is not a party to the joint venture agreement, but its director is a party.
211.The obverse principle can be seen in Gulf Pacific Pty Ltd v Londish,[91] where it was held that the director can be liable in equity where the joint venture agreement only binds his or her company.
[91] [1992] FCA 502 (‘Gulf Pacific’).
1 vote -
Create a new alert category for class actions / representative proceedings
I'd like to set up alerts for class actions/representative proceedings.
4 votes -
will want to add a reference in the prior citations to https://jade.io/article/508476 for PKT Technologies Pty Ltd (formerly known as Fairli
Please add a reference in the prior citations to https://jade.io/article/508476 for PKT Technologies Pty Ltd (formerly known as Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd) v Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1587.
Also, why do you categorise patent and trade mark cases as "Copy"?
1 vote -
User-highlighting
Allow for user-highlighting of cases within the Jade interface, so that the cases can be exported and/or printed already highlighted.
5 votes -
delete account
how do I delete my account?
1 vote -
Chrome Android - unable to tag highlighted segments unless using mouse
I regularly read cases on my Android phone. Selecting text does not bring up the tagging dialog, presumably because it requires a mouse hover action. Are you able to trigger the tagging dialog from normal text selection in chrome for Android? Cheers, Michael
4 votes -
Add Western Australia Legislation
As new Jade Professional subscribers with an Office in Perth that seems to be urgent.
1 vote -
provide a detailed search history
Provide a detailed 'search history' so that when I am creating a research note (i.e. a note detailing which terms I have searched) I can simply look back on this history and compile my note.
1 vote -
Include Fiduciary Obligations and Powers of Attorney as a topic heading for alerts
I'd like to refine my alerts to better catch judgments concerning financial elder abuse. Adding the above topics to the alerts might help.
1 vote -
2 votes
-
1 vote
-
Fix R v Ellis references in DPP v McInnes
DPP v Mcinnes [2017] VSCA 374
Every citation of R v Ellis redirects to R v Brazel, where it should (of course) refer to R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603. Please fix. Thanks in anticipation.
1 vote -
Fix R v Ellis references in DPP v McInnes
DPP v Mcinnes [2017] VSCA 374
Every citation of R v Ellis redirects to R v Brazel, where it should (of course) refer to R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603. Please fix. Thanks in anticipation.
0 votes -
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
1 vote -
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
0 votes
- Don't see your idea?