BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
116 results found
-
1 vote
-
Ensure that footnote hyperlinks work properly
The problem appears to be widespread, at least on Chrome browser.
One example: https://jade.io/article/299492 footnote 2
3 votes -
Error in citation
In Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 829 list of cases cited refers to "Kurks" - should be "Kucks"
1 vote -
Fix Bug - Citator for subsections
Bringing up the citations for a section when accessing the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (C2019C00158) in the Jade Brower tab omits the option to search by subsection for a number of sections or doesn't include all citations. E.g. section 7 should have subsections available in the citations panel.
If you open the Act in the Citator tab, there are 5357 unmatched sections which expand to numerous subsections, paragraphs etc. These used to be available when opening the citation tab to the right of the legislation in the Jade Browser tab. Is there any way to return these?…
1 vote -
Link to authorised reports
When setting out the citations for a case in the right hand side panel, hyperlink the citations to the relevant reports. So, e.g., in the sidebar for Pipikos v Trayans [2018] HCA 39; 265 CLR 522; 92 ALJR 880, "265 CLR 522" would link directly to the report on WestlawAU, and "92 ALJR 880" would do likewise for the report on LexisNexis.
I much prefer using Jade for all research purposes, but of course still need to get the authorised reports. If Jade could link through to the relevant report providers (at least for the key Australian reports like the…
1 vote -
fix bug
The Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) is not displaying properly. Can you check please.
1 vote -
Case name - Banksia Trial
Hi, See link https://jade.io/article/313370
When I try to get the citation for the case of Bolitho v Banksia Securities Ltd & Ors, Why does the citation link show 'Ifka v Shahin Enterprises Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 8' ?
(I think the correct citation for Ifka V Shahin is VSCA 8 (not VSC 8)
Could you please confirm?
thanks!1 vote -
1 vote
-
Bug in a case
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case) (2017) 274 IR 460 takes you to the wrong case.
https://jade.io/article/567337?asv=citation_browser shows you a case of Kenny J: FKP18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1555 but this is actually a 2018 case.
[2017] FCA 1555 is
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case), a Tracey J decision.1 vote -
It would be wonderful if you could please create a proper hyper-linked index for the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of C&C Act)
It's quite difficult to navigate the Australian Consumer Law on Jade at the moment (unless I'm missing something obvious) and also, it is not possible to use the citator to refer to specific sections within that Schedule 2 section (all of the references just plug to the header on page one of the Australian Consumer Law). Thanks!
7 votes -
Fix a problem with Vice-Chancellor Macquarie University v FM
Most of the links to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) should be to Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)
1 vote -
Add metadata to your pages to allow e.g. Zotero to recognise souce
Jade suffers a defect that e.g. Austlii does not suffer from, which is that your pages currently do not contain metatags of their content that allows programs like e.g. Zotero to recognise sources properly.
This makes Jade quite clumsy and inefficient for legal researchers who use citation programs like Zotero or Endnote to compile and use sources.
It's very simple to implement, this page would offer your web developers some starting points: https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/exposing_metadata
4 votes -
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
Fix bug as below
"SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship" goes to "Sandy on behalf of the Yugara People v State of Queensland (No 2)" in some cases.
1 vote -
Website does not always load correctly
Occasionally when accessing jade via Chrome, only the search bar will load and not the rest of the page. You are also not able to search and need to reload page (sometimes a number of times) for it to load the web page correctly. Have been able to replicate this on several PCs. Is this something that has been reported or can be looked into?
3 votes -
Tool so that users can see if they have viewed Jade content
My suggestion is that you establish a way in which users can tell whether they have read a case (for instance, by changing the colour of the heading). This tool is currently operative on Caselaw.
4 votes -
allow manual addition of cases to Topics
I have been doing a number of High Risk Offender matters in the Supreme Court in recent weeks. I've just noticed that the Jade Topic for this area doesn't seem to include key decisions (for example Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57; Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374). I would be happy to manually add a few of these decisions to the topic, but don't know if this is possible.
1 vote -
6 votes
-
Include the Full Court judgment referred to below in your database.
Endeavour Energy v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FCAFC 82; (2016) 244 FCR 178 is mentioned in your citations, but appears not to be in your database.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?