hi guys. Check this case: Express Cargo Services Pty Ltd v Mysko [2023] SASC 11. The hyperlinks are such a GREAT idea, but they don't work.
Hi guys, I was so impressed with the hyperlink approach in this case. Surely it has to be the way of future court reports instead of these ridiculous tomes that are the current format. With hyperlinks the reader can immediately go to salient points. With so many cases impacting not only on students but also practitioners, this is the way of the immediate future (before more AI impacts of course). PROBLEM: the hyperlinks don't appear to take me to the proper target in this case. Can you check it and see what you get please. I'm dying to use the approach. First time I've seen it. I'm a second term law student in a JD> The link to jade is https://jade.io/article/970606
Andy Busuttil
shared this idea
-
Andy Busuttil
commented
Hi again. You responded to me and said the hyperlinks are working. I'm talking about the hyperlinks in section A. When you click on these hyperlinks they take you to the Jade homepage instead of the section in the case that they are supposed to take you to. Of course the hyperlinks in the case itself are going to work, but they are 'old hat' now. It's the ones at the top of the case that are the issue.For example click on Summary of the Parties' cases and you will be taken here: https://jade.io/ This happens on a new Mac OS and on the latest Windows.
-
Andy Busuttil
commented
I have also been arguing for greater use of hyperlinks in assignments for the JD programme. The current system of AGLC4 while good as a method of directing the reader to the source is, I believe, anachronistic. Hyperlinking in the digital world makes much much more sense.