BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
124 results found
- 
Bug in a caseAustralian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case) (2017) 274 IR 460 takes you to the wrong case. https://jade.io/article/567337?asv=citation_browser shows you a case of Kenny J: FKP18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1555 but this is actually a 2018 case. [2017] FCA 1555 is 
 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Footscray Station Case), a Tracey J decision.1 vote
- 
1 vote
- 
Case name - Banksia TrialHi, See link https://jade.io/article/313370 
 When I try to get the citation for the case of Bolitho v Banksia Securities Ltd & Ors, Why does the citation link show 'Ifka v Shahin Enterprises Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 8' ?
 (I think the correct citation for Ifka V Shahin is VSCA 8 (not VSC 8)
 Could you please confirm?
 thanks!1 vote
- 
Link to authorised reportsWhen setting out the citations for a case in the right hand side panel, hyperlink the citations to the relevant reports. So, e.g., in the sidebar for Pipikos v Trayans [2018] HCA 39; 265 CLR 522; 92 ALJR 880, "265 CLR 522" would link directly to the report on WestlawAU, and "92 ALJR 880" would do likewise for the report on LexisNexis. I much prefer using Jade for all research purposes, but of course still need to get the authorised reports. If Jade could link through to the relevant report providers (at least for the key Australian reports like the… 1 vote
- 
Error in citationIn Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 829 list of cases cited refers to "Kurks" - should be "Kucks" 1 vote
- 
Confirm your email accounts when people register.Someone signed up with my email address and I have been unable to cancel the account or redirect to junk mail. 1 vote
- 
1 vote
- 
Correct erroneous case title and linkThe judgment in Olefines Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales, a judgment of Molesworth AJ in the Land and Environment Court of NSW, being [2018] NSWLEC 18, is erroneously cited on Jade as Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council. There is no connection between these cases. This needs correction. Thank you. 1 vote
- 
Can you please set up a "Space Law" topic so that I can create an alert for this?Can you please create a new topic for Space Law, which is its own emerging area of law? 1 vote
- 
fix a bugHi. The CaseTrace for Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association v Woolworths SA Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 67 links to a special leave decision for an entirely different and unrelated matter. Thanks, Michael 1 vote
- 
fix a search problemI searched for Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic). I went to the document. I went to section 110, and clicked the little plus button that shows documents citing s 110. I went to page three of the results. I then clicked "edit this search" and confined the results to only those from courts. On running the search, I got a blank page. I worked out from the URL that this is because it was showing me page 3 of a set of results that did not extend beyond one page. 1 vote
- 
Edit Search BugAfter editing a search you are returned to the same number page you were previously on. If the new search returns fewer pages than the previous search and you were previously on a page greater than the number of pages for the new search (Eg you were previously on page 6 of 10 and after editing the search there are only 3 pages) there is no way to navigate to the search results (in the example above you are sent to page 6 of 3). 1 vote
- 
More clarity around citationsThe citations feature is a wonderful boon and I wish it had been around when I started practice. It would help me to have more clarity about the coverage of a citations report. For example the citations to section 10 of the Registered Clubs Act do not mention one of the leading cases being Seagulls in the Court of Appeal; but at the end of the citations there is a note which is cryptic to me, saying that "New South Wales Law Reports Case – Requires Subscription" (which is doubly cryptic to me because some of the other cases actually… 1 vote
- 
fix a bugHello! I've noticed the link to 'download original document' in relation to the transcripts for Ha v New South Wales ([1997] HCATrans 69-74) all return 500 errors. Not entirely sure what's wrong there but may be the URL is incomplete - they all end with '/1', whereas other links to original transcripts seem to have 7-digit numbers. Can this be fixed? Thanks! 1 vote
- 
add WA Warden decisions to databaseDear Jade 
 I'm a professional subscriber from WA. The WA (mining) Warden decisions have recently been added to austlii (http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WAWM/) but only in pdf format.
 It seems the Warden cases aren't in Jade databases (particularly the citation workings). If austlii or the WA agencies, had these available online in text, would that enable Jade to include in your databases?
 Thanks for your great service.
 Best1 vote
- 
make a "playlist" with all the cases set for the Bar Exam reading listImagine a list of all the cases required for the Bar Exam in one "playlist" 1 vote
- 
fix missing link to Bridge StockbrokersThe links to Bridge Stockbrokers v Bridge seems to be missing - I tried clicking on the link in Harcourts WA v Roy Weston No 5 and also searching in the Jade search bar
 1 vote
- 
Bug in caseFederal Commissioner of Taxation V Applegate [1979] takes you to a wrong case 1 vote
- 
I suggest that you create a separate topic for the Interpretation/Construction of Contracts. II suggest you create a new topic for the Construction or Interpretation of Contracts 1 vote
- 
Problem linking to caselawNSWHello, links to 'original source' for NSW cases are throwing up an 
 HTTP Status 400 - Bad request
 and have been doing so for the past few weeks. There's no problem with other jurisdictions, just with NSW cases. Could you please let me know if this is a problem just for me or a problem with Jade?1 vote
- Don't see your idea?