Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

129 results found

  1. hi guys. Check this case: Express Cargo Services Pty Ltd v Mysko [2023] SASC 11. The hyperlinks are such a GREAT idea, but they don't work.

    Hi guys, I was so impressed with the hyperlink approach in this case. Surely it has to be the way of future court reports instead of these ridiculous tomes that are the current format. With hyperlinks the reader can immediately go to salient points. With so many cases impacting not only on students but also practitioners, this is the way of the immediate future (before more AI impacts of course). PROBLEM: the hyperlinks don't appear to take me to the proper target in this case. Can you check it and see what you get please. I'm dying to use the…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. You've got R v Barger [1908] HCA 43 as "1932] AC 41" which is Donoghue v Stevenson

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Fix this reference

    I have been trying to find citations to Katsilis v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1977) 18 ALR 181; (1977) 52 ALJR 189 but when I search for it in Jade I keep being directed to Allen v Tobias [1958] HCA 13; 98 CLR 367, which is not the same case.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. fix a missing link - the link to original document for the case Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamo(2023) VCAT 634 is missing

    Please fix missing link to original document for - Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamond Creek Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] VCAT 634

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. open https://jade.io/article/317167 - "fragrantly" s/be "flagrantly".

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. Availability of Corporations Act volumes 2-7

    Only volume 1 of the Corporations Act is available - there does not seem to be any way to view volumes 2-7, other than through the small preview windows available for individual sections.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. it looks like the health practitioner regulation national law is broken...

    On this page: https://jade.io/article/353065
    The schedule is missing and the citations that refer to that schedule are instead being treated as if they cite sections of the parent act.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    Add coronial inquest findings for NSW

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. Correct the judgment

    Hi folks,
    LH v R [2024] NSWCCA 165 seems to be listed as the Commonwealth DPP appearing, whereas in fact it was the NSW ODPP. See NSW Caselaw.
    Thanks!
    KG

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. Please fix the bug so I can download the cases.

    I am unable to download cases at the moment. Please give an idea on when this will be fixed.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. correct the entry for [2017] actsc 5 which should be Estate of Love not Farrell

    see above

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. NT Legislation update

    Good morning,

    I haven't been able to get through to an editor, could you please update 'Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT)' there have been amendments since early 2024.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. Please unsubscribe me from your emails. I have tried clicking unsubscribe but I am still getting emails.

    Please unsubscribe me from your emails. I have tried clicking unsubscribe but I am still getting emails.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see [2025] HCASJ 17

    HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see 'Date of Hearing: 19 March 2025 Date of Judgment: 13 May 2025 [2025] HCASJ 17'

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. link 2018 WASAT 94 to its appeal - [2019] WASC 270

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. It would be wonderful if you had a Word plug-in which automatically suggests the full case citation (

    It would be wonderful if you had a Word plug-in which automatically suggests an auto-complete for the full case citation (a bit like the search bar on the Jade website).

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. In the past, when I got the result of what I searched for, i could see the whole result. Now, i can only access 50. I detest this change.

    In the past, when I got the result of what I searched for, i could see the whole result. Now, i can only access 50. I detest this change

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. fix typo on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro

    Typo/formatting issue on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro.

    Appears to be a formatting issue with the text under the heading "Upgrade to JADE Professional", after the full stop.

    "Purpose-built by Australian Lawyers, JADE Professional’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way.’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way."

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. [2006] WASAT 91 RV and PL brings up [2008] WASAT 91Shire of York

    [2006] WASAT 91 RV and PL brings up [2008] WASAT 91Shire of York - could you amend it please?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. Remove dual-factor login

    The new requirement to not only login, but also to obtain a code through your email, is slow and buggy.

    I keep being told I have received a verification code, but have not. I have checked my spam folder. I have clicked 'resend'. This happens repeatedly.

    What used to be a quick and enjoyable user experience has become a slow and painful one.

    Here's hoping Jade removes this unnecessary dual-factor login by default.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
1 2 3 4 6
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories