Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

116 results found

  1. Link to authorised reports

    When setting out the citations for a case in the right hand side panel, hyperlink the citations to the relevant reports. So, e.g., in the sidebar for Pipikos v Trayans [2018] HCA 39; 265 CLR 522; 92 ALJR 880, "265 CLR 522" would link directly to the report on WestlawAU, and "92 ALJR 880" would do likewise for the report on LexisNexis.

    I much prefer using Jade for all research purposes, but of course still need to get the authorised reports. If Jade could link through to the relevant report providers (at least for the key Australian reports like the…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Fix Bug - Citator for subsections

    Bringing up the citations for a section when accessing the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (C2019C00158) in the Jade Brower tab omits the option to search by subsection for a number of sections or doesn't include all citations. E.g. section 7 should have subsections available in the citations panel.

    If you open the Act in the Citator tab, there are 5357 unmatched sections which expand to numerous subsections, paragraphs etc. These used to be available when opening the citation tab to the right of the legislation in the Jade Browser tab. Is there any way to return these?…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Error in citation

    In Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 829 list of cases cited refers to "Kurks" - should be "Kucks"

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Confirm your email accounts when people register.

    Someone signed up with my email address and I have been unable to cancel the account or redirect to junk mail.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. If I enter a surname and Advanced Search 'Representative' only counsels/solicitors etc come up in the search. No 'advocates'

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. Correct erroneous case title and link

    The judgment in Olefines Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales, a judgment of Molesworth AJ in the Land and Environment Court of NSW, being [2018] NSWLEC 18, is erroneously cited on Jade as Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council. There is no connection between these cases. This needs correction. Thank you.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. Can you please set up a "Space Law" topic so that I can create an alert for this?

    Can you please create a new topic for Space Law, which is its own emerging area of law?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. fix a bug

    Hi.

    The CaseTrace for Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association v Woolworths SA Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 67 links to a special leave decision for an entirely different and unrelated matter.

    Thanks,

    Michael

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. fix a search problem

    I searched for Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic). I went to the document. I went to section 110, and clicked the little plus button that shows documents citing s 110. I went to page three of the results. I then clicked "edit this search" and confined the results to only those from courts. On running the search, I got a blank page. I worked out from the URL that this is because it was showing me page 3 of a set of results that did not extend beyond one page.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. Edit Search Bug

    After editing a search you are returned to the same number page you were previously on. If the new search returns fewer pages than the previous search and you were previously on a page greater than the number of pages for the new search (Eg you were previously on page 6 of 10 and after editing the search there are only 3 pages) there is no way to navigate to the search results (in the example above you are sent to page 6 of 3).

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. More clarity around citations

    The citations feature is a wonderful boon and I wish it had been around when I started practice. It would help me to have more clarity about the coverage of a citations report. For example the citations to section 10 of the Registered Clubs Act do not mention one of the leading cases being Seagulls in the Court of Appeal; but at the end of the citations there is a note which is cryptic to me, saying that "New South Wales Law Reports Case – Requires Subscription" (which is doubly cryptic to me because some of the other cases actually…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. fix a bug

    Hello!

    I've noticed the link to 'download original document' in relation to the transcripts for Ha v New South Wales ([1997] HCATrans 69-74) all return 500 errors. Not entirely sure what's wrong there but may be the URL is incomplete - they all end with '/1', whereas other links to original transcripts seem to have 7-digit numbers. Can this be fixed?

    Thanks!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. add WA Warden decisions to database

    Dear Jade
    I'm a professional subscriber from WA. The WA (mining) Warden decisions have recently been added to austlii (http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WAWM/) but only in pdf format.
    It seems the Warden cases aren't in Jade databases (particularly the citation workings). If austlii or the WA agencies, had these available online in text, would that enable Jade to include in your databases?
    Thanks for your great service.
    Best

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. make a "playlist" with all the cases set for the Bar Exam reading list

    Imagine a list of all the cases required for the Bar Exam in one "playlist"

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. fix missing link to Bridge Stockbrokers

    The links to Bridge Stockbrokers v Bridge seems to be missing

    • I tried clicking on the link in Harcourts WA v Roy Weston No 5 and also searching in the Jade search bar
    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. Bug in case

    Federal Commissioner of Taxation V Applegate [1979] takes you to a wrong case

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. I suggest that you create a separate topic for the Interpretation/Construction of Contracts. I

    I suggest you create a new topic for the Construction or Interpretation of Contracts

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. Problem linking to caselawNSW

    Hello, links to 'original source' for NSW cases are throwing up an
    HTTP Status 400 - Bad request
    and have been doing so for the past few weeks. There's no problem with other jurisdictions, just with NSW cases. Could you please let me know if this is a problem just for me or a problem with Jade?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. hi guys. Check this case: Express Cargo Services Pty Ltd v Mysko [2023] SASC 11. The hyperlinks are such a GREAT idea, but they don't work.

    Hi guys, I was so impressed with the hyperlink approach in this case. Surely it has to be the way of future court reports instead of these ridiculous tomes that are the current format. With hyperlinks the reader can immediately go to salient points. With so many cases impacting not only on students but also practitioners, this is the way of the immediate future (before more AI impacts of course). PROBLEM: the hyperlinks don't appear to take me to the proper target in this case. Can you check it and see what you get please. I'm dying to use the…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. You've got R v Barger [1908] HCA 43 as "1932] AC 41" which is Donoghue v Stevenson

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
1 2 3 5
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)