Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

137 results found

  1. there's a link which is to the wrong case - Ridis as cited in McElwaine is incorrect - link takes you to a decision called Parker

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Bug - unable to generate PDF of cases

    Your download case in PDF function seems to still be down. Any idea when this will be resolved? Thank you

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Printing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. delete all info regarding Jack Denis MULDER v. Director of Prosecution 3 sept 2015

    all info is false and now well outdated
    why is it still mentioned on internet?

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Table of contents failure

    The table of contents is a real time saver.

    Here is an example of where it fails, though:
    https://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#article=67936

    PFENNIG v THE QUEEN (1995) 182 CLR 461.

    Nothing gets listed in the TOC.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Legislation has been 'appealed'

    When I look up the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (Vic) it says it has been appealed.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. allow alerts to exclude topics. I would like to receive all civil cases but not criminal cases. I can't find a way to do that.

    allow alerts to exclude topics. I would like to receive all civil cases but not criminal cases. I can't find a way to do that.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. add Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 to Jade. It is an important decision in the protective jurisdiction.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. allow more case names to come up in the visualisations

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. bug or citation error

    I was exploring Jade Professional.

    I uploaded a brief with a citation to Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (2014) 105 IPR 60. The report says the citation is wrong and should be replaced with Lahood v Bank of Western Australia (No 2).

    But the citation is correct

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. What's happened to the legislation citator - all links seem to be visible in citator mode

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. not translate the names of companies in foreign languages from the original - Life Of Water Pty Ltd v Williams [2015] NSWSC 804

    Over enthusiastic translation renders the name of a company (n french - which is the company name) in english. Life Of Water Pty Ltd v Williams [2015] NSWSC 804 is La Vie d'Eau Pty Ltd v Williams.....

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. Integrate in-text search with Firefox

    Having found a case, Jade hijacks the in-text search function to some extent but, at least in Firefox, it only partially hijacks it. This can lead to the Firefox search jumping in and then neither Jade nor Firefox searches work quite right.

    Some suggestions:
    * Have an option to turn off the Jade "hijacking" of ordinary browser searching within a page
    * Make sure Jade properly "hijacks" F3 and Shift-F3 shortcuts for "next search item" and "previous search item" respectively

    Unrelated, but also helpful, would be to allow full looping when moving through search results - ie I'd like to…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. In-text searching from partway through a document

    It would be very helpful if pressing F3 when scrolled partway through a document would jump to the next search result, beginning from the top of the visible screen. This would allow a much more natural movement through the document when reviewing search hits in a document.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. fix mistake in relation to commencement date

    Hi,
    I have been looking at the Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic) and I believe some of the commencement information of certain sections may be incorrect.

    For example it says that s184 commenced on the 1st of January 2012, however I believe it commenced on the 1st of July, 2012.

    Hope this is helpful. Thanks!

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. The link to Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 in IceTV v Nine Network (at least in footnote 41) goes to the wrong case

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. The link to Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 in IceTV v Nine Network (at least in footnote 41) goes to the wrong case

    Same thing happens when you click on Interlego in the search bar results - something to do with the media neutral citations issue?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. Missing decision in Purvis precedent visualisation

    I was checking out the precedent visualisation for Purvis v The State of NSW [2003] HCA 62, and noticed the most recent decision from the Qld Court of Appeal in Woodforth v State of Queensland [2017] QCA 100 does not appear therein (https://jade.io/article/531142).

    The Woodforth decision is important in that it is the first court of appeal that rejects the application of the Purvis decision when applied to a discrimination provision that differs from that in the DDA. This case will have ripple effects in other Australian discrimination jurisdictions.

    It would be good if the visualisation tool includes it.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. Bug - this case not loading. Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923

    Not loading.

    Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923 (13 July 2017) (Parker J)

    July 13th at 12:12 PM via Jade Equity

    Catchwords: Contracts – retainer between solicitor and client – guarantee – construction – multiple contractual documents – main object of contract – deferral of costs – termination of retainer – acceleration of deferred costs – charges of property – consent to lodgement of caveat – issue of tax invoices – interest – repugnancy ...

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. Fix citation error

    In The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition tribunal [2012] HCA 36 there are several incorrect citations at paragraph 14. Douglass v R is [2012] HCA 34, not 36.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. This search [2000] SASC 296

    Is not picking up this decision, Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1941 in the citatory.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
1 3 5 6 7
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories