Skip to content

BarNet JADE

Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

118 results found

  1. Index SAET decisions

    It would be very helpful to integrate decisions of the South Australian Employment Tribunal, particularly given the per-section citation functions of Jade. They are currently published here: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/cases/sa/SAET/

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  2. Patricia Denise Lyneen

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  3. Ensure that footnote hyperlinks work properly

    The problem appears to be widespread, at least on Chrome browser.

    One example: https://jade.io/article/299492 footnote 2

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  4. Website does not always load correctly

    Occasionally when accessing jade via Chrome, only the search bar will load and not the rest of the page. You are also not able to search and need to reload page (sometimes a number of times) for it to load the web page correctly. Have been able to replicate this on several PCs. Is this something that has been reported or can be looked into?

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  5. H-Index for Barristers based on citations

    Right now it can be difficult for solicitors to know who are more experienced or competent counsel when they are looking for someone to brief. It would be amazing to have an equivalent to an academic H-Index, and would be quite easily implemented (eg in each decision, the counsel's name is crawled and aggregated to a particular counsel's 'profile'. Counsel could register on jade and claim their profile and fill in details like a link to their bio etc. and can 'claim' decisions which are missed by the automatic function. Similar to eg google scholar or academia.edu.

    The system could…

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  6. File download name

    When you download a case from Jade make the file name the case name and citation

    3 votes
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  7. Expensive points

    This is a comment pertaining to financial trustworthiness. I just had white gold and perfect 3 sapphire ring stolen when it was on my neck as I slept by someone who wants to prove I am indeed inept and need financial management.
    I am afraid to go to Berry St as thr system has been a giant test and the diamond necklace from zgrandpa was 6qnkednoff my neck but I fought for it.
    How is this fair when people get paid to make me look even worse?

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Mobile JADE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  8. Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd comes up as the wrong case

    I was looking for NORTH EASTERN DAIRY CO. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W. ; CARROLL'S FOOD MART PTY. LTD. v. DAIRY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF N.S.W.

    (1975) 134 CLR 559

    17 October 1975 and found the search result was Nevill v Fine Art and General Insurance Co Ltd.

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  9. Create a filter option for "tribunals" in addition to "all courts".

    Currently, to search in all tribunals you must select them individually which takes time and is inefficient. It would be nice to have an "all tribunals" option alongside "all courts" and "all legislation".

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  10. Register window is not working properly- window is wrong size and cuts off some details needed to complete registration.

    Register window is not working properly- window is wrong size and cuts off some details needed to complete registration.

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  11. Have a simple process for cancelling subscriptions. I've tried looking on the website, asking live chat, emailing and phoning.

    It would be great if accounts could be managed online - maybe I've missed the relevant part of the website, but live chat didn't know either and told me to email. My email was acknowledged by someone who was sad that I'd asked to cancel and offered training so I could get more out of my subscription, and neither of my calls to support have been returned

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Responsiveness  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  12. separate the workers compensation cases out from the Employment, labour and industial topic, which should be reserved for employment law.

    3 votes
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  13. Are you planning to include Tasmanian legislation in the near future?

    2 votes
    1 comment  ·  Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  14. Bug - unable to generate PDF of cases

    Your download case in PDF function seems to still be down. Any idea when this will be resolved? Thank you

    2 votes
    0 comments  ·  Printing  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  15. there's a link which is to the wrong case - Ridis as cited in McElwaine is incorrect - link takes you to a decision called Parker

    2 votes
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  16. add the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Tribunal to the list of courts that are in your alerts list.

    As the DFDAT is effectively a court of appeal which sits with 3 judges from the Federal Court and the State Supreme Courts, it is superior appellate tribunal that would enhance your alerts list.

    2 votes
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  17. Missing decision in Purvis precedent visualisation

    I was checking out the precedent visualisation for Purvis v The State of NSW [2003] HCA 62, and noticed the most recent decision from the Qld Court of Appeal in Woodforth v State of Queensland [2017] QCA 100 does not appear therein (https://jade.io/article/531142).

    The Woodforth decision is important in that it is the first court of appeal that rejects the application of the Purvis decision when applied to a discrimination provision that differs from that in the DDA. This case will have ripple effects in other Australian discrimination jurisdictions.

    It would be good if the visualisation tool includes it.

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  18. Bug - this case not loading. Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923

    Not loading.

    Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923 (13 July 2017) (Parker J)

    July 13th at 12:12 PM via Jade Equity

    Catchwords: Contracts – retainer between solicitor and client – guarantee – construction – multiple contractual documents – main object of contract – deferral of costs – termination of retainer – acceleration of deferred costs – charges of property – consent to lodgement of caveat – issue of tax invoices – interest – repugnancy ...

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  19. HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see [2025] HCASJ 17

    HCA Single Judge decisions are not being cited correctly in the left hand column: see 'Date of Hearing: 19 March 2025 Date of Judgment: 13 May 2025 [2025] HCASJ 17'

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  20. Get older state court decisions on Jade.

    I am working with Permanent Building Society v Wheeler (1994) 11 WAR 187. It doesn't appear to be on Jade since too old. Would be great to get all decisions of state courts onto Jade. Thank you!

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
2 4 5 6
  • Don't see your idea?

BarNet JADE

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)