BarNet JADE
Welcome to BarNet’s JADE suggestion system. Any ideas are good ones. We want to hear from you!
47 results found
-
fix a bug
Hi.
The CaseTrace for Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association v Woolworths SA Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 67 links to a special leave decision for an entirely different and unrelated matter.
Thanks,
Michael
1 vote -
More clarity around citations
The citations feature is a wonderful boon and I wish it had been around when I started practice. It would help me to have more clarity about the coverage of a citations report. For example the citations to section 10 of the Registered Clubs Act do not mention one of the leading cases being Seagulls in the Court of Appeal; but at the end of the citations there is a note which is cryptic to me, saying that "New South Wales Law Reports Case – Requires Subscription" (which is doubly cryptic to me because some of the other cases actually…
1 vote -
Bug in case
Federal Commissioner of Taxation V Applegate [1979] takes you to a wrong case
1 vote -
hi guys. Check this case: Express Cargo Services Pty Ltd v Mysko [2023] SASC 11. The hyperlinks are such a GREAT idea, but they don't work.
Hi guys, I was so impressed with the hyperlink approach in this case. Surely it has to be the way of future court reports instead of these ridiculous tomes that are the current format. With hyperlinks the reader can immediately go to salient points. With so many cases impacting not only on students but also practitioners, this is the way of the immediate future (before more AI impacts of course). PROBLEM: the hyperlinks don't appear to take me to the proper target in this case. Can you check it and see what you get please. I'm dying to use the…
1 vote -
Fix this reference
I have been trying to find citations to Katsilis v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1977) 18 ALR 181; (1977) 52 ALJR 189 but when I search for it in Jade I keep being directed to Allen v Tobias [1958] HCA 13; 98 CLR 367, which is not the same case.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
add the attached case to your database. I acted for the successful defendant! :-)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCC/2008/1621.html
from Michael Martin
1 vote -
Bug
The Gulf Pacific link goes to the incorrect decision. See below.
Caple v Wilson [2016] VSC 704
210.The decision of Wilcox J in Krizaic indicates that a company can be liable even where it is not a party to the joint venture agreement, but its director is a party.
211.The obverse principle can be seen in Gulf Pacific Pty Ltd v Londish,[91] where it was held that the director can be liable in equity where the joint venture agreement only binds his or her company.
[91] [1992] FCA 502 (‘Gulf Pacific’).
1 vote -
Fix R v Ellis references in DPP v McInnes
DPP v Mcinnes [2017] VSCA 374
Every citation of R v Ellis redirects to R v Brazel, where it should (of course) refer to R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603. Please fix. Thanks in anticipation.
1 vote -
fix typo on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro
Typo/formatting issue on https://jade.io/j/?a=go_pro.
Appears to be a formatting issue with the text under the heading "Upgrade to JADE Professional", after the full stop.
"Purpose-built by Australian Lawyers, JADE Professional’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way.’s suite of legal research tools ensures you’re better prepared for whatever comes your way."
1 vote -
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
The link to Golan v AOTC in paragraph 83 of R v Roberts & Urbanec [2004] VSCA 1; 9 VR 295 takes one to the wrong case.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Fix citation
BHP v Steuler; Protec v Steuler [2014] VSCA 338; 100 ACSR 524
check this citation. I'm not sure it is reported in 100 ACSR
1 vote -
Fix citation error
In The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition tribunal [2012] HCA 36 there are several incorrect citations at paragraph 14. Douglass v R is [2012] HCA 34, not 36.
1 vote -
Bug - this case not loading. Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923
Not loading.
Malouf v Constantinou [2017] NSWSC 923 (13 July 2017) (Parker J)
July 13th at 12:12 PM via Jade Equity
Catchwords: Contracts – retainer between solicitor and client – guarantee – construction – multiple contractual documents – main object of contract – deferral of costs – termination of retainer – acceleration of deferred costs – charges of property – consent to lodgement of caveat – issue of tax invoices – interest – repugnancy ...
1 vote -
Missing decision in Purvis precedent visualisation
I was checking out the precedent visualisation for Purvis v The State of NSW [2003] HCA 62, and noticed the most recent decision from the Qld Court of Appeal in Woodforth v State of Queensland [2017] QCA 100 does not appear therein (https://jade.io/article/531142).
The Woodforth decision is important in that it is the first court of appeal that rejects the application of the Purvis decision when applied to a discrimination provision that differs from that in the DDA. This case will have ripple effects in other Australian discrimination jurisdictions.
It would be good if the visualisation tool includes it.
1 vote -
fix mistake in relation to commencement date
Hi,
I have been looking at the Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic) and I believe some of the commencement information of certain sections may be incorrect.For example it says that s184 commenced on the 1st of January 2012, however I believe it commenced on the 1st of July, 2012.
Hope this is helpful. Thanks!
1 vote -
1 vote
-
add WA Warden decisions to database
Dear Jade
I'm a professional subscriber from WA. The WA (mining) Warden decisions have recently been added to austlii (http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WAWM/) but only in pdf format.
It seems the Warden cases aren't in Jade databases (particularly the citation workings). If austlii or the WA agencies, had these available online in text, would that enable Jade to include in your databases?
Thanks for your great service.
Best1 vote -
allow manual addition of cases to Topics
I have been doing a number of High Risk Offender matters in the Supreme Court in recent weeks. I've just noticed that the Jade Topic for this area doesn't seem to include key decisions (for example Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57; Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374). I would be happy to manually add a few of these decisions to the topic, but don't know if this is possible.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?